2020 — 2024

HP 1CPQ Product Design Team

Building a global high-performance team from scratch

Context

In 2020 I joined HP Inc. as the sole UX designer on the 1CPQ (Configure, Price, Quote) team inside the Commercial organisation. The workload was manageable at first. But as CPQ set out to deliver more products and more features for HP partners, the need for more designers stopped being a matter of opinion.

The team serves external users — HP resellers and distributors — and internal ones, HP sales representatives among them. The objective is that every market adopts the tools successfully, with a shorter turnaround time behind them, so business runs smoother for HP partners.

This study is about the part that was never drawn in Figma: making the case for a design team with the evidence to carry it, and then building one from the ground up — global, and remote.

Outcome & Impact

1 → 7

Designers on the team

From one in 2020 to seven by 2024, across Config, Price, Quote and Sales Experience.

2,856 hrs

Clocked in six months

By two designers, against the 1,440 hours a healthy six months holds.

4,545.5 hrs

Forecast, the eight after

59% more than the six months behind it. This is the number the headcount case rested on.

14 of 28

Epics deployed

Shipped to production across PI 5 and PI 6, March to November 2021.

Measuring workload

In 2020 the CPQ team moved product development onto agile. Each stream runs on a Product Increment as its release train, and every PI carries many projects at many scopes — a feature improvement in one, a whole new product for a new business in the next.

So I started counting. From September 2020 to February 2021 I logged the hours my design partner — who joined two months after me — and I actually spent, project by project, as the foundation for forecasting the PIs ahead. What came back was not a matter of feeling stretched: two designers were carrying a headcount ratio of 3.97 against HP’s own healthy ceiling of 3.0.

Six months of clocked hours, project by project — the case in one slide.
Six months of clocked hours, project by project — the case in one slide.

Projects breakdown

To forecast the next six months — two PIs — from the six behind us, every project first had to be sized. I sorted them into three tiers by the hours they take over a six-month window.

Two designers should ideally clock 1,440 hours over that window: 120 hours a month, each, for six months. We clocked 2,856. The team was over-utilised by 1,416 hours — a second team’s worth of work, absorbed by the two people already there.

Large scale

501 hrs +

Over six months — more than two Product Increments of a single stream.

Medium scale

251 – 500 hrs

Over the same six months.

Small scale

Up to 250 hrs

Over the same six months, averaging 80.

Working hours, two designers, against the 1,440-hour healthy load.

Healthy load, 2 designers · Any six months

1,440 hrs

Clocked · Sep 2020 – Feb 2021

2,856 hrs

Forecast · Mar – Oct 2021

4,545.5 hrs

Large scale

501 hrs and above

Opportunity creation
744 hrs
cMPS
96 hrs
Supplies (SBD)
168 hrs
One Config
204 hrs
Product Finder integration
456 hrs
HP CPQ design system
456 hrs

Medium scale

251 – 500 hrs

Business justification form
60 hrs
IQ Deals
264 hrs

Small scale

Up to 250 hrs

IQ Leasing
156 hrs
Smart FYA email
84 hrs
Pre-OPG sync-back
12 hrs
Quoter page, channel & direct
12 hrs
Direct design improvements, APJ & AMS
144 hrs

Total, two designers

2,856 hrs

Forecast

Pricing each project at the floor of its tier — the minimum for large and medium scale, the 80-hour average for small — the same two designers were on course to clock 4,545.5 hours between March and October 2021. That is 59% more than the six months behind us had already cost, and those six months were the ones that broke the ratio.

The forecast is what turned the ask into arithmetic: two more designers, needed for large-scale work like the Quoter landing page redesign and UI/UX governance, neither of which had anyone to give it to.

Large scale

7 x 501 hrs

Opportunity creation
PI 5
cMPS
PI 5, PI 6
Supplies
PI 6
One Config
PI 5, PI 6
Product Finder integration
PI 5
UI/UX governance
Not on a PI
Quoter landing page redesign
PI 6

Medium scale

3.5 x 251 hrs

Business justification form
PI 5
EUV automisation
PI 5, PI 6
IQ Deals
PI 5

Small scale

2 x 80 hrs

IQ Leasing
PI 5, PI 6
Smart FYA
PI 5, PI 6

Forecast, March – October 2021

4,545.5 hrs

Result

Management approved the headcount, and chose to grow the team step by step rather than all at once. Here is where March to November 2021 landed.

Looking back at PI 5–6: 28 epics, 14 of them deployed, five designers across Config, Price and Quote.
Looking back at PI 5–6: 28 epics, 14 of them deployed, five designers across Config, Price and Quote.

Grow

By 2024 the CPQ design team had gone from one designer to seven, with each workstream — Config, Price and Quote — served by name, and Sales Experience (MyCRM) added as a fourth focus. The map below is how we kept that legible: every program in the ecosystem, and the designers standing behind it.

The 1CPQ and MyCRM ecosystem, with a designer against every program.
The 1CPQ and MyCRM ecosystem, with a designer against every program.
Back to all work